MSSAFOTCBlank ChecksUS GAAP · USD

Metal Sky Star Acquisition Corp

Metal Sky Star Acquisition Corp is a special purpose acquisition company formed to complete a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, or similar business combination with an operating business. It has no operating business of its own and instead holds IPO proceeds in trust while searching for a target, with its recent disclosures showing active but unsuccessful deal-making efforts.

Net income-0.6m USD
−160.0 %y/y

Fiscal year 2025 · change from previous year

Development 2022–2025

-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.0m USD2022: EBIT -0.40 m USD20222023: EBIT -0.80 m USD20232024: EBIT -0.80 m USD20242025
RevenueOperating profit (EBIT)
Ask Clarifo about Metal Sky Star Acquisition Corp

Business

Share of revenue
SPAC formation and capital pool100 %

The company raises capital through an IPO and private units and holds the proceeds in trust for a future acquisition.

Business combination execution0 %

It negotiates and structures a merger or similar transaction with a private operating company.

Public-company listing access0 %

It offers a target company a route to become publicly traded through a de-SPAC transaction.

Customers

Metal Sky does not sell products to end customers; its counterparties are private operating companies that may become merger targets. Recent disclosures show interest in targets across technology and telecom-related businesses, including Okidoki OÜ and Fedilco Group Limited/Viva Armenia. The economic value proposition is access to public markets, capital, and a faster listing path than a traditional IPO.

Private company merger targets

Operating businesses that may combine with Metal Sky to become publicly listed and access trust capital.

Founders and existing shareholders

Owners of target companies who may roll equity into the combined public company and retain upside.

Capital markets counterparties

Sponsors, underwriters, and financing partners that support the SPAC structure and transaction execution.

Strategy

The company’s strategy is to identify and close a business combination before its SPAC deadline, using trust proceeds and any additional financing to fund the transaction. Recent letters of intent indicate a willingness to pursue cross-border targets, but the repeated termination and non-binding status of proposals show execution risk remains high. Maintaining marketability and financing flexibility is important because delisting reduces the attractiveness of the SPAC as a merger partner.

Close a business combinationShort term

The SPAC model only creates value if a target is acquired and the combined company is formed.

Secure financing and approvalsShort term

Cross-border transactions require regulatory approvals and sufficient capital to complete.

Restore transaction credibility after failed processMedium term

Prior termination of the Future Dao merger and delisting can weaken negotiating leverage.

Geography

The company is incorporated in the Cayman Islands and is headquartered in the United States, but its business is transaction-driven rather than operationally geographic. Its disclosed deal activity has included targets in Estonia, Cyprus, and Armenia, showing that it can pursue cross-border combinations. Because it has no operating revenue, geography mainly affects legal approvals, listing status, and transaction execution risk.

Risks

The main risk is that the company may fail to complete a business combination, which would undermine the SPAC structure and could force liquidation or other adverse outcomes. Delisting from Nasdaq and trading on OTCID reduces liquidity, marketability, and the company’s appeal as a merger partner, while cross-border targets add regulatory and approval complexity. As a blank check company with no operating revenue, it also faces going-concern pressure and dependence on sponsor or external funding.

Sorted by severity
LowMediumHighLowMediumHighImpact →Likelihood →Failure to complete a business combination1Nasdaq delisting and OTC trading2
Impact is the risk’s severity and likelihood how probable it is over the next few years, both assessed from the company’s reports. Numbers match the list.
  1. Failure to complete a business combinationImpact: CriticalLikelihood: High

    The company has no operating business and depends on closing a transaction to create value.

    Exposure: SPAC deadline and target execution

  2. Nasdaq delisting and OTC tradingImpact: HighLikelihood: High

    Loss of exchange listing reduces liquidity, investor access, and attractiveness to targets.

    Exposure: Marketability of securities and merger partner status

  3. Going-concern and funding shortfallImpact: High

    The company reported a working capital deficit and needs additional capital to continue operations.

    Exposure: Sponsor loans or third-party financing

  4. Cross-border regulatory approvalsImpact: Medium

    Potential targets in Armenia and elsewhere require local permissions and customary approvals.

    Exposure: Transaction timing and closing certainty

Accounting

Judgemental items
Warrant classification

Management must assess whether warrants are equity- or liability-classified under ASC 480/815.

Impact: Can change balance sheet presentation and earnings volatility

Redeemable ordinary shares and EPS

Shares subject to redemption are excluded from basic EPS and require special allocation of income.

Impact: Affects per-share results and comparability

Trust account fair value and interest income

Income from marketable securities and unrealized gains/losses can swing quarterly results.

Impact: Drives reported net income despite no operating business

Going-concern assessment

Working capital deficit and limited cash outside the trust require funding assumptions.

Impact: May affect disclosure and investor assessment of survival risk

Publicly listed companies with a comparable business focus.

Last updated: 24/09/2026