Clarifo
← Articles
10.2026

Nordic company data: where to find it in the primary filings

Reliable Nordic company data comes from the companies' own interim reports, ESEF annual reports and stock exchange releases. Where to download them, how to use the reporting calendar and how to compare peers, with UPM, Stora Enso and Metsä Board.

The most reliable Nordic company data is the data the companies publish themselves: interim and half-year reports, financial statements releases, annual reports in ESEF format and stock exchange releases on Nasdaq Helsinki and Nasdaq Stockholm. Every figure in a model should trace back to one of these documents, with its period and page.

This article sets out which source answers which question, where to download the filings, how to use the reporting calendar, and how to compare peers fairly, with UPM-Kymmene, Stora Enso and Metsä Board as the worked example.

The primary sources for Nordic company data

Each document type has a different job. The table below shows what each one contains and when to use it.

SourceWhat it containsUse it for
Interim report or half-year reportCondensed IFRS statements, quarter and year-to-date columns, segment tables, CEO review, outlookLatest quarter, segment trends, guidance
Financial statements release (Sweden: year-end report)Fourth quarter and full-year figures, dividend proposalQ4 figures, weeks before the annual report
Annual report (ESEF)Audited consolidated statements, full notes, machine-readable tagsAudited annual figures, accounting policies, notes
Stock exchange releaseInside information, guidance changes, acquisitions, management changesEvents between reports

Source: our summary of the disclosure documents published by companies listed on Nasdaq Helsinki and Nasdaq Stockholm.

Secondary data, such as broker and sponsored research, consensus estimates or third-party databases, is useful for context and forecasts but should never replace the reported figure. When the two disagree, the filing wins.

Where to download the filings

Every company publishes its reports on its investor relations site and through the exchange's release service. Annual reports in ESEF format are also stored by each country's officially appointed mechanism (OAM), and filings.xbrl.org, XBRL International's open repository, collects ESEF filings from across Europe.

Companies listed on Nasdaq Copenhagen and Euronext Oslo publish the same document types, including ESEF annual reports, so the method in this article applies across the Nordics; the examples below use Helsinki and Stockholm. Clarifo builds its Nordic equity research data from these same filings and links every figure to the page it came from.

Use the reporting calendar to know when figures change

Nordic companies announce their report dates in advance, and reporting clusters in a few weeks after each quarter end. On 28 October 2026, for example, our calendar listed Q3 2026 interim reports from Fortum Oyj and F-Secure Oyj on Nasdaq Helsinki and from Epiroc and Electrolux Professional on Nasdaq Stockholm, all on the same day.1

Two practical points follow. First, a peer comparison run in the middle of the season mixes companies that have reported Q3 with companies still on Q2, so record the period of each figure. Second, some companies publish only half-year reports with shorter business reviews for the first and third quarters, so a quarter without a full income statement is often the company's reporting choice. For how the US season is shaping up at the same time, see our note on the Q3 earnings season.

How to compare Nordic peers on a like-for-like basis

Same line, same name

Use the IFRS operating profit line for every company, or the adjusted figure for every company, never a mix. Adjusted measures differ by company.

Ratios across currencies

Helsinki peers mostly report in EUR, Stockholm peers mostly in SEK. Compare margins and returns directly; convert absolute figures only with a stated rate.

Same fiscal period

Line up periods by end date and keep discrete quarters apart from year-to-date figures printed in the same table.

Worked example: operating margins of three Nordic forest companies

UPM-Kymmene Oyj (UPM), Stora Enso Oyj (STERV) and Metsä Board Oyj (METSB), all listed on Nasdaq Helsinki and reporting in EUR, make a clean peer set: same exchange, same currency, same accounting framework. The chart below shows each company's operating margin for FY2023 to FY2025, computed as IFRS operating profit (ifrs-full:ProfitLossFromOperatingActivities) divided by revenue, both from the companies' ESEF filings, such as UPM-Kymmene's FY2025 annual report and Stora Enso's FY2025 annual report.

Nordic forest peersOPERATING MARGINStora Enso and Metsä Board swapped placesIFRS operating profit / revenue, FY2023 to FY2025 · percentUPM-Kymmene+2.0 ppFY20235.8%FY20245.8%FY20257.8%Stora Enso+13.5 ppFY2023−3.4%FY20241.0%FY202510.1%Metsä Board−15.7 ppFY20236.2%FY20243.2%FY2025−9.5%→ A single-year screen would have missed both moves.
Source: UPM-Kymmene, Stora Enso and Metsä Board ESEF annual reports FY2023–FY2025 · clarifo.com
FY2025, EUR millionRevenueOperating profitOperating margin, %
UPM-Kymmene9,6567497.8
Stora Enso9,32694210.1
Metsä Board1,776−170−9.5

Source: UPM-Kymmene, Stora Enso and Metsä Board ESEF annual reports FY2023–FY2025. Margin = operating profit / revenue.234

Over three years the order changed completely. Stora Enso moved from an operating loss in FY2023 to the highest margin of the three in FY2025, while Metsä Board went from the highest margin in FY2023 to an operating loss of EUR 170 million in FY2025. A single-year screen would have missed both moves. The segment tables and CEO reviews in each company's reports explain what drove the change, and they are the next thing to read.

Bringing in a Nasdaq Stockholm forest company adds SEK figures. Keep the margin comparison as it is and show its revenue in SEK, rather than converting at one exchange rate for three years.

Reading tone alongside the numbers

Figures tell you what happened; the CEO review tells you how management reads it. Our CEO Barometer scores the CEO review in each interim and annual report on a 0–100 index across six themes, with every quote verified word for word against the report. It describes tone and does not predict share prices, but it is a consistent way to compare how peers talk about demand and profitability in the same quarter.

To run this kind of comparison in Claude or ChatGPT, see our guide to AI equity research tools. A prompt for the example above:

Using Clarifo, compare the operating margins of UPM-Kymmene, Stora Enso and Metsä Board for FY2023 to FY2025 from their annual reports, and cite the filing for each figure.

Search Nordic and US filings, open company pages and compare peers with every figure linked to the report page it came from.

Start with Clarifo Use Clarifo in Claude or ChatGPT

  1. Clarifo reporting calendar, Nordic interim reports scheduled for 28 Oct 2026, retrieved 28 Oct 2026.
  2. UPM-Kymmene Oyj, annual reports FY2023–FY2025 (ESEF), consolidated income statement. FY2025 report page.
  3. Stora Enso Oyj, annual reports FY2023–FY2025 (ESEF), consolidated income statement. FY2025 report page.
  4. Metsä Board Oyj, annual reports FY2023–FY2025 (ESEF), operating result (ifrs-full:ProfitLossFromOperatingActivities) and revenue.

Not investment advice. Figures are based on data reported by the companies.